When families separate, decisions around children, finances, and property can quickly turn into legal battles. While many countries offer alternatives like mediation, the data shows that New Zealanders are heading to the Family Court at much higher rates than people in Australia or the UK.
But why is this happening — and what does it mean for families?
A Look at the Numbers
Let’s compare recent figures from each country:
| Country | Population | Annual Family Court Applications | Applications per 1,000 People |
|---|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 5.1 million | 61,890 | 12.1 |
| Australia | 26 million | 89,373 | 3.4 |
| UK (England & Wales) | 59 million | 265,308 | 4.5 |
Sources: (estimate)
-
New Zealand: Family Court statistics – Courts of NZ (2023–24)
-
Australia: Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia Annual Report 2020–21
-
UK (England & Wales): Family Court Statistics – GOV.UK
In simple terms:
-
In New Zealand, about 1 in every 8 people is connected to a Family Court application each year.
-
In Australia, it’s 1 in 29.
-
In the UK, it’s around 1 in 22.
That means New Zealand’s rate of family court usage is more than triple that of its Commonwealth counterparts.
What’s Behind the Numbers?
Several factors may be influencing these high figures:
1. Limited Early Intervention Services
New Zealand’s family law system doesn’t always catch disputes early. While services like Parenting Through Separation and Family Dispute Resolution exist, they may not be enough — or accessible enough — to prevent court escalation.
2. Fewer Legal Alternatives
In Australia and the UK, structured family mediation services are more widely used, better funded, and often required before going to court. This encourages resolution outside the courtroom.
3. Legal Aid Grant leniency
Access to legal aid in New Zealand is easier than other countries like UK and Australia.
4. Cultural and Structural Differences
There may also be deeper cultural and systemic reasons. Kiwis might see the court as a more accessible or trusted resolution channel. Or, high litigation rates could reflect underlying family stress, housing issues, or economic pressure.
Mediation vs Litigation: Choosing the Right Path
While the Family Court is essential — especially in cases involving violence or safety concerns — it’s not always the best first step.
Mediation offers a more peaceful, cost-effective way to resolve parenting and property issues — especially where safety isn’t a concern.
Litigation should be a last resort, reserved for when legal protections or urgent court intervention are needed.
Final Thoughts
New Zealand’s high rate of family court use raises serious questions. Are families getting the right support before things escalate? Is the system truly accessible — or are people turning to court because they have nowhere else to go?
As we compare with other countries, one thing becomes clear: more investment in early resolution, mediation, and support services could keep families out of court and on better paths forward.
Need Support?
If you’re facing separation, parenting disputes, or relationship property issues, we’re here to help. Request a call back
